Legal Protection for Online Ojek Drivers Who are Victims of Fictitious Order
Keywords:
Legal Protection, Online Ojek Drivers, Fictitious Orders, Compensation Mechanisms, Gig EconomyAbstract
This study explores the legal protection available to online ojek drivers in Indonesia who fall victim to fictitious orders, a prevalent issue that impacts their financial stability and emotional well-being. The current partnership model between drivers and application companies limits drivers' legal protections, making them vulnerable without access to compensation or adequate support in reporting incidents. Through a normative juridical approach, the research evaluates existing regulations, identifies barriers faced by drivers in seeking justice, and emphasizes the roles of both the government and app companies in enhancing protections. Key recommendations include establishing clearer compensation mechanisms, improving reporting systems, strengthening legal frameworks, and utilizing advanced technology for fraud detection. Ultimately, the study calls for collaborative efforts to create a safer and fairer work environment for drivers in the gig economy.
References
Ayunita, Y., A. Yahanan, & M. Syaifuddin. 2019. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pengemudi Taksi (Mitra) Berbasis Online pada PT. Grab Indonesia. Lex LATA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 51-64.
Candrawati, E., R. Kusnari, H. Hermi, N. J. Sariono, & D. T. Subagiyo. 2021. Role of Law and Social Stratification for Online Taxibike Consumer According to the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 8 1999 Considering Consumer Protection. International Journal of Economics, Business, and Accounting Research, 4(3), 234-249.
Izzati, N. R. 2022. Ketidakseimbangan Kewajiban Para Pihak dalam Regulasi Ojek Online: Distorsi Logika Hubungan Kemitraan Ekonomi Gig. Universitas Jambi Law Journal, 5(2), 325-356.
Lala, A., E. Suparman, & A. Purnawan. 2022. Legal Protection of Online Taxi-bike Driver from Work Accident in Indonesia. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, 5(6), 255-263.
Purba, M. S. M. & F. R. Sinaga. 2021. The Legal Liability of Online Driver for Passengers Accident in Consumer Protection Law. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 5(2), 341-353.
Putri, H. S. & A. Diamantina. 2019. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Keselamatan dan Keamanan Pengemudi Ojek Online untuk Kepentingan Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1(3), 392-403.
Republik Indonesia. 1999. Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara Nomor 22 Tahun 1999. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. 2008. Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Nomor 58 Tahun 2008. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.
Rochma, A. 2019. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Driver yang Mengalami Kerugian Akibat Order Fiktif pada Layanan GrabFood. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 87-96.
Sukmayanti, M. S. & I. M. Sudirga. 2022. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Driver Ojek Online yang Mengalami Kerugian Akibat Tindakan Konsumen yang Melakukan Pesanan Fiktif. Sanglah Law Journal, 1(3), 100-110.
Waliyullah, W. A. 2020. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengemudi Go-Jek atas Pesanan Fiktif di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 8(2), 210-221.
Wijaya, H. A. & D. A. Setiawan. 2021. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Orderan Fiktif Ojek Online Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 752-757.
Zuama, A. P. C., C. M. Dinda, & D. Pamungkas. 2021. Telaah Regulasi Ojek Online di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Filsafat Fenomenologi Hukum. Jurnal Regulasi dan Hukum, 25(1), 45-61.
